Comments on: Stud and Fighter Instructions http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:54:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: skimpy http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1785 skimpy Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:28:48 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1785 yes i agree. will elaborate on that in another post. yes i agree. will elaborate on that in another post.

]]> By: skimpy http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1784 skimpy Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:28:09 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1784 all my S&F posts will have a stud bias. you need to keep that filter on while reading. i'm not sure there is a clear-cut transformation. i think it's just to do with the way you think when you're young. i'm trying to find evidence to support my hypothesis that studs can be "made" and are not "born". let's see how that goes. all my S&F posts will have a stud bias. you need to keep that filter on while reading.

i’m not sure there is a clear-cut transformation. i think it’s just to do with the way you think when you’re young. i’m trying to find evidence to support my hypothesis that studs can be “made” and are not “born”. let’s see how that goes.

]]> By: skimpy http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1783 skimpy Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:26:35 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1783 i admit that i've been overdosing on this concept nowadays and have been force-fitting a bit. i admit that i’ve been overdosing on this concept nowadays and have been force-fitting a bit.

]]> By: FOTBW http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1775 FOTBW Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:17:10 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1775 The Fighter-Stud instruction model must factor in the variable of Fighterness or Studness of instruction recipient which you've just grazed upon at the end but it can be a post in itself. The Fighter-Stud instruction model must factor in the variable of Fighterness or Studness of instruction recipient which you’ve just grazed upon at the end but it can be a post in itself.

]]> By: Varun http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1770 Varun Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:54:11 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1770 I was going through the seminal post on S & F, the thing that struck me was that it has a stud bias, fair. But, every stud at some point in time would have been a fighter(Be it in during infancy or may be during adolescence and further may be even during teens) and the fighter qualities upon reaching the zenith makes the individual a Stud, i.e., every stud was once a fighter but every fighter need not be a stud! The transition from being a fighter to a stud takes very little time to some- to people who are destined to be studs,by default; but some take a long time to be "converted"-These fall into the category of people who desire to be studs for its appeal, and they fight their way to attain stud-hood! and then remain studs forever, with fighter qualities which remain masked at the back of the mind. The case is totally different with people who are fighter & studs; who unlike others get into the required mold as and when the situation demands! I was going through the seminal post on S & F, the thing that struck me was that it has a stud bias, fair.
But, every stud at some point in time would have been a fighter(Be it in during infancy or may be during adolescence and further may be even during teens) and the fighter qualities upon reaching the zenith makes the individual a Stud, i.e., every stud was once a fighter but every fighter need not be a stud!

The transition from being a fighter to a stud takes very little time to some- to people who are destined to be studs,by default; but some take a long time to be “converted”-These fall into the category of people who desire to be studs for its appeal, and they fight their way to attain stud-hood! and then remain studs forever, with fighter qualities which remain masked at the back of the mind.

The case is totally different with people who are fighter & studs; who unlike others get into the required mold as and when the situation demands!

]]> By: Kunal http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1763 Kunal Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:24:47 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1763 "He that is good with a hammer tends to think everything is a nail." “He that is good with a hammer tends to think everything is a nail.”

]]> By: skimpy http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1761 skimpy Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:20:43 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1761 which is? sorry i'm bulbing here. plis to be educating me. which is? sorry i’m bulbing here. plis to be educating me.

]]> By: Kunal http://noenthuda.com/blog/2009/03/20/stud-and-fighter-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-1747 Kunal Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:06:37 +0000 http://noenthuda.com/blog/?p=1224#comment-1747 Repeated Stud & Fighter posts bring up quite another hammer-and-nail analogy in my mind, axually :) Repeated Stud & Fighter posts bring up quite another hammer-and-nail analogy in my mind, axually :)

]]>